In the past few days, Trump and Harris argued for more than an hour in the debate between the US presidential candidates. After the debate, there was overwhelming public opinion on the Internet at home and abroad, saying that Trump lost. But if you look closely at the debate that lasted more than an hour, it is not difficult to find that Trump stepped into a "trap" and lost too unfairly. Harris dared to use any tricks to win. According to statistics from the New York Times, in this debate, Harris spoke for 37 minutes and 41 seconds, of which 46.2% of the time was spent attacking Trump. Trump spoke for 43 minutes and 03 seconds, of which 29.9% of the time was spent attacking Harris. In terms of the percentage of offensive language output, Trump suffered a loss. Because Harris has several key labels, which are the current political correctness of the United States, and Trump cannot say.

First, minority identity; second, women's rights; third, skin color. Trump said a lot of things, and once Harris extended them to these aspects, Trump immediately lost his temper. This is still the smallest loss Trump has suffered. What is really surprising is Harris's large-scale use of "out-of-the-box tricks". What is the "out-of-the-box" method? Harris's out-of-the-box tricks have already begun when the debate venue was selected. The venue for this debate was chosen in Philadelphia, an important city in Pennsylvania, USA. As an important swing state in the US election, Trump and Harris both want to win votes in Pennsylvania through debates. Therefore, the Republicans and Democrats have no objection to choosing Philadelphia. But the problem is that the organizer of Philadelphia is the pro-Democratic media, ABC. So everyone saw a "spectacle". When Trump began to attack Harris, the two anchors of ABC began to "introduce data" to the audience, saying that Trump's words were "rumors". When Harris attacked Trump, she used evidence to prove that what Harris said was true. So, it seems that Trump and Harris are in a 1-on-1 debate, but in fact it is Trump 1-on-3, and he lost too unfairly. It really fits the classic saying, "Referees, organizers, co-organizers, all units are my people, how can you fight with me?"

Moreover, because Trump likes to stir up the audience's emotions, this debate did not arrange for the audience to attend, which also resulted in Trump not being able to play to his greatest advantage. Instead, Harris, after a week of internal special training, mastered some of Obama and Hillary's classic rhetoric and routines. Moreover, at the beginning, Trump obviously underestimated his opponent and only flew over a few hours before the start. Harris, on the other hand, had been preparing for several days. Intuitively speaking, after watching for more than an hour, the biggest feeling is that no matter who wins this election, the United States loses.

In order to win more votes, Harris did three shocking things. First, the upper limit of the amount of "zero-dollar purchase" crime in the United States has been raised from 950 US dollars to 1,500 US dollars, which is already 10,000 RMB. As long as the price of the robbery does not exceed this amount, it is not considered a crime. Second, in terms of LGBT, children are free to change their gender without parental consent. It really means that you can send your son to school in the morning and turn him into a daughter after school in the afternoon. Third, immigration policy is taken over by the federal government, and states are not allowed to restrict immigration privately. In contrast, Trump's bottom line is not low enough. For example, restricting immigration, revitalizing the manufacturing industry, increasing military investment, cracking down on crime, and giving drug dealers the death penalty.

It can be said that the points raised by Harris and Trump are completely opposite, echoing several opposing groups in American society. Furthermore, no matter who comes to power, the supporters of both sides are already incompatible. The Republican Party has already said that as long as Trump loses, Texas will become independent. The contradictions in the US election have become irreconcilable. Its result is no longer to decide who will be president, but to decide who will ignite the civil war in the United States.