The United States' desire for world hegemony has been demonstrated in its actions. We often say, "Where there are people, there are rivers and lakes." Similarly, sooner or later, you will have to pay for what you have done. The United States relies on its hegemony to enjoy all the benefits of the world. From the perspective of the United States, there is nothing wrong with maintaining its hegemony, but the mistake is that the way the United States consolidates its hegemony is too outrageous. In order to help Israel and safeguard its own interests in the Middle East, the United States is willing to help the evil and allow Israel to launch genocide in the Middle East. For this reason, the Houthi armed forces stepped forward, fearless of power, and directly attacked the United States.
A while ago, the news that the USS Eisenhower was hit by a missile from the Houthi armed forces was widely circulated. Although all the evidence confirming the "hit" is false so far, the topic of "US aircraft carrier hit by Houthi armed forces" is still hot. The reason is that in addition to the statement of the Houthi armed forces, the attitude of the United States is more intriguing.
According to normal logic, the aircraft carrier, as a symbol of the United States' global hegemony, has been repeatedly provoked by the Houthis, and the incident should be clarified in the shortest possible time with the most resolute attitude. However, the attitude of the Americans is puzzling. It seems that they do not care about the Houthis' claims, and even do some things that make things more obvious.
As a result, the outside world is divided into two attitudes. One side stands on the side of the Houthi armed forces, believing that the US aircraft carrier was hit. The other side stands on the side of the United States, believing that the Houthi weapons cannot pose a threat to the US aircraft carrier. Just a few days ago, the spokesman of the Yemeni Houthi armed forces issued another statement, saying that the Houthis used missiles to attack the USS Eisenhower aircraft carrier in the Red Sea.
On the same day, two US officials denied the claim that the USS Eisenhower had been attacked again, and said that the "replacement" aircraft carrier, the USS Roosevelt, would take over the escort mission in the Red Sea. However, many people also joked that it was probably a "coincidence" that the USS Eisenhower withdrew from the Red Sea just after the Houthi armed forces announced that they had hit the target.
If the withdrawal of the USS Eisenhower was an unusual move, then in East Asia, the US aircraft carriers have moved again. Obviously, in order to maintain US hegemony, the US has deployed its forces in two directions. At the same time, it can also be said from a certain perspective that Putin's deterrence has worked.